Emanuel v. U.S. Department of Justice
This text of Emanuel v. U.S. Department of Justice (Emanuel v. U.S. Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_________________________________________ ) JOSEPH EMANUEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1514 (RBW) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The United States Department of Justice filed a motion to dismiss or for summary
judgment on December 29, 2011. In its January 12, 2012 Order, the Court advised the plaintiff,
among other things, of his obligation to file an opposition or other response to the motion.
Further, that Order expressly warned the plaintiff that, if he failed to file his opposition by
February 3, 2012, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither
has filed an opposition nor requested additional time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will treat
this motion as conceded. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
SO ORDERED.
DATE: February 23, 2012 REGGIE B. WALTON United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Emanuel v. U.S. Department of Justice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emanuel-v-us-department-of-justice-dcd-2012.