Emanuel v. State
396 S.E.2d 225, 260 Ga. 425
Opinion
We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Emanuel v. State, 195 Ga. App. 302 (393 SE2d 74) (1990), upon this inquiry: “Whether [appellants’] motion for directed verdict on the issue of entrapment should have been granted.”
We believe that the proper disposition of these appeals is that urged in Judge Pope’s dissent, joined by Judge Sognier. 195 Ga. App. at 305-7.
Accordingly, we adopt the dissent as the opinion of this court.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Emanuel v. State, 396 S.E.2d 225, 260 Ga. 425 (Ga. 1990).
396 S.E.2d 225 (Emanuel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cummings v. State
505 S.E.2d 73 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Haralson v. State
479 S.E.2d 115 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Whitt v. State
452 S.E.2d 125 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Jordan v. State
448 S.E.2d 917 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Gilbert v. State
441 S.E.2d 785 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Miller v. State
427 S.E.2d 570 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Wilkey v. State
416 S.E.2d 350 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Ordonez v. State
415 S.E.2d 179 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Hill v. State
405 S.E.2d 258 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)
Emanuel v. State
403 S.E.2d 899 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)