Emanuel v. Free Lance Photographers Guild, Inc.

28 Misc. 2d 503, 219 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2187
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 17, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 Misc. 2d 503 (Emanuel v. Free Lance Photographers Guild, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emanuel v. Free Lance Photographers Guild, Inc., 28 Misc. 2d 503, 219 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record satisfactorily establishes that defendants sold plaintiff’s photograph in good faith and in the honest belief that it was the photograph of another female, from whom they had obtained for a consideration a release to sell it, and in the absence of proof that defendants knowingly used plaintiff’s portrait or picture, exemplary damages may not be awarded. (Civil Rights Law, § 51.)

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs to defendants-appellants.

Concur — Hoestadter, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cabaniss v. Hipsley
151 S.E.2d 496 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Misc. 2d 503, 219 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emanuel-v-free-lance-photographers-guild-inc-nyappterm-1960.