Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Emanuel v. Florida Parole Commission

Emanuel v. Florida Parole Commission

742 So. 2d 292, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9589, 1998 WL 423058
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 29, 1998
DocketNo. 97-4300
StatusPublished

This text of 742 So. 2d 292 (Emanuel v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emanuel v. Florida Parole Commission, 742 So. 2d 292, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9589, 1998 WL 423058 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with Sheley v. Florida Parole Commission, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), we have treated this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, and we deny relief on the merits. However, to [293]*293the extent we have undertaken review by certiorari, we certify conflict, as we did in Sheley, with Johnson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 543 So.2d 875 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

JOANOS and WEBSTER, JJ. and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheley v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
703 So. 2d 1202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Johnson v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N
543 So. 2d 875 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
742 So. 2d 292, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9589, 1998 WL 423058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emanuel-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-1998.