Emanuel v. Ennis
16 Jones & S. 430
This text of 16 Jones & S. 430 (Emanuel v. Ennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Emanuel v. Ennis, 16 Jones & S. 430 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).
Opinion
The facts being as found by the learned judge below, the conclusions of law follow from the facts found by force of the statute of descents, as interpreted by the court of appeals in Wheeler v. Clutterbuck (52 N. Y. 67).
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wheeler v. . Clutterbuck
52 N.Y. 67 (New York Court of Appeals, 1873)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 Jones & S. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emanuel-v-ennis-nysuperctnyc-1882.