Emanuel Escobedo v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 13, 2015
Docket07-15-00043-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Emanuel Escobedo v. State (Emanuel Escobedo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emanuel Escobedo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________

No. 07-15-00043-CR ________________________

EMANUEL ESCOBEDO, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 108th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 67,999-E; Honorable Douglas Woodburn, Presiding

March 13, 2015

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Pending before this Court is a Motion to Dismiss Appeal filed by Appellant,

Emanuel Escobedo, in which he requests to withdraw his notice of appeal and dismiss

this appeal. According to the motion, this appeal was filed in error because no

judgment has been entered by the trial court. The motion is signed by counsel, but not

by Appellant. Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure governs voluntary

dismissals in a criminal case. The appellant and his attorney must sign a written motion

to dismiss. Id. at (a). The purpose of the Rule is to protect an appellant from having his

appeal dismissed by counsel without consent and to insure that counsel has notice of

the dismissal to advise the client on the consequences of a dismissal. Conners v.

State, 966 S.W.2d 108, 110 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd). Given the

posture of the underlying case and no judgment having been entered, we apply Rule 2

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to suspend the requirement that Appellant’s

signature appear on the motion to dismiss. We grant the motion.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained

and this Court’s mandate shall issue forthwith.

Patrick A. Pirtle Justice

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conners v. State
966 S.W.2d 108 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Emanuel Escobedo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emanuel-escobedo-v-state-texapp-2015.