Emad Hana Bajju v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
This text of Emad Hana Bajju v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Emad Hana Bajju v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 30, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
146858 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack EMAD HANA BAJJU and AMAL BASHA, David F. Viviano, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Justices
v SC: 146858 COA: 307365 Macomb CC: 2009-001046-NI STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and LAURA CHRISTENE BROWN, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 5, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 30, 2013 t0722 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Emad Hana Bajju v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emad-hana-bajju-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-ins-mich-2013.