E.M. v. State

820 So. 2d 1069, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9707, 2002 WL 1477881
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 11, 2002
DocketNo. 1D01-5052
StatusPublished

This text of 820 So. 2d 1069 (E.M. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E.M. v. State, 820 So. 2d 1069, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9707, 2002 WL 1477881 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

E.M. appeals a final order adjudicating him delinquent for battery and placing him on twelve months’ probation. His sole issue On appeal is that the trial court erred in adjudicating him delinquent based on the sufficiency of the evidence. Because this specific argument was not made before the trial court, we are foreclosed from reviewing it. See S.V.E. v. State, 689 So.2d 1283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); see also § 924.051(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001) (requiring [1070]*1070the issue to be raised before, and ruled on by, the trial court in order to be presérved for appeal). Accordingly, we affirm E.M.’s adjudication and disposition.

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, C.L, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

S.V.E. v. State
689 So. 2d 1283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
820 So. 2d 1069, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9707, 2002 WL 1477881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/em-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.