E.M. v. State
541 So. 2d 165, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 901, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1938, 1989 WL 33975
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 11, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1410
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 541 So. 2d 165 (E.M. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
E.M. v. State, 541 So. 2d 165, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 901, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1938, 1989 WL 33975 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
E.M. appeals from an adjudication of delinquency on the ground that the trial court erred in relying solely on hearsay testimony to establish the essential element of suspension on a charge of trespass upon school grounds. The state having correctly conceded error, we reverse.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tundidor v. State
541 So. 2d 165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
541 So. 2d 165, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 901, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1938, 1989 WL 33975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/em-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.