E.M. v. State
541 So. 2d 165, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 901, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1938, 1989 WL 33975
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 1989·No. No. 88-1410·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
E.M. appeals from an adjudication of delinquency on the ground that the trial court erred in relying solely on hearsay testimony to establish the essential element of suspension on a charge of trespass upon school grounds. The state having correctly conceded error, we reverse.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E.M. v. State, 541 So. 2d 165, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 901, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1938, 1989 WL 33975 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
541 So. 2d 165 (E.M. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tundidor v. State
541 So. 2d 165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)