Elzholz v. Elzholz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Elzholz v. Elzholz

50 A.D.2d 570, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12330

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 570 (Elzholz v. Elzholz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elzholz v. Elzholz, 50 A.D.2d 570, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

The respective attorneys for the parties on this appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered August 5, 1975, have agreed, after a conference in this court before Mr. Justice Gittleson, on October 22, 1975, that the appeal be withdrawn and that the case be heard at Special Term for clarification as to what personal property shall remain in the marital residence, and they thereupon signed a stipulation to such effect. In accordance with the foregoing, the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs, and the case is referred to Special Term, Part V, for a hearing for clarification and specification of the personal property which shall remain in the marital residence. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respective attorneys for the parties on this appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered August 5, 1975, have agreed, after a conference in this court before Mr. Justice Gittleson, on October 22, 1975, that the appeal be withdrawn and that the case be heard at Special Term for clarification as to what personal property shall remain in the marital residence, and they thereupon signed a stipulation to such effect. In accordance with the foregoing, the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs, and the case is referred to Special Term, Part V, for a hearing for clarification and specification of the personal property which shall remain in the marital residence. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 570, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elzholz-v-elzholz-nyappdiv-1975.