Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Elyea Inc. v. Cenker

Elyea Inc. v. Cenker

185 S.E. 253, 182 Ga. 287, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 335
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 31, 1936·No. No. 10933·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

Under the pleadings and the evidence which tended to support the allegations of the petition, the judge did not abuse his discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Watkins, Grant ■& Watkins, for plaintiff in error. Little, Powell, Reid & Goldstein, James K. Rankin, and Garter, Garter & Johnson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elyea Inc. v. Cenker, 185 S.E. 253, 182 Ga. 287, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 335 (Ga. 1936).

185 S.E. 253 (Elyea Inc. v. Cenker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Saul
5 S.E.2d 214 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Zugar v. Scarbrough
197 S.E. 854 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Elyea Inc. v. Cenker
190 S.E. 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)