Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Elyea Inc. v. Cenker

Elyea Inc. v. Cenker

185 S.E. 253, 182 Ga. 287, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 335
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 31, 1936
DocketNo. 10933
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 185 S.E. 253 (Elyea Inc. v. Cenker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elyea Inc. v. Cenker, 185 S.E. 253, 182 Ga. 287, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 335 (Ga. 1936).

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

Under the pleadings and the evidence which tended to support the allegations of the petition, the judge did not abuse his discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Watkins, Grant ■& Watkins, for plaintiff in error. Little, Powell, Reid & Goldstein, James K. Rankin, and Garter, Garter & Johnson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Saul
5 S.E.2d 214 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Zugar v. Scarbrough
197 S.E. 854 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Elyea Inc. v. Cenker
190 S.E. 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 S.E. 253, 182 Ga. 287, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elyea-inc-v-cenker-ga-1936.