Ely v. Ely

53 A. 1125, 64 N.J. Eq. 790, 19 Dickinson 790, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 213
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 17, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 A. 1125 (Ely v. Ely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ely v. Ely, 53 A. 1125, 64 N.J. Eq. 790, 19 Dickinson 790, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 213 (N.J. 1902).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Yan Syckel, Collins. Foet, Gaeeetson, I-Iendeiokson, Bogebt, Adams, Yeedenbuegi-i, Yooehees, Yeoom—11.

For reversal—Dixon, Pitney—2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freitag v. Bersano
198 A. 845 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 A. 1125, 64 N.J. Eq. 790, 19 Dickinson 790, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ely-v-ely-nj-1902.