Ely v. Ely

53 A. 1125, 64 N.J. Eq. 790, 19 Dickinson 790, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 213
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 17, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Yan Syckel, Collins. Foet, Gaeeetson, I-Iendeiokson, Bogebt, Adams, Yeedenbuegi-i, Yooehees, Yeoom—11.

For reversal—Dixon, Pitney—2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ely v. Ely, 53 A. 1125, 64 N.J. Eq. 790, 19 Dickinson 790, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 213 (N.J. 1902).

53 A. 1125 (Ely v. Ely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freitag v. Bersano
198 A. 845 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1938)