Ely v. Curtis

60 N.H. 513
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1881
StatusPublished

This text of 60 N.H. 513 (Ely v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ely v. Curtis, 60 N.H. 513 (N.H. 1881).

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The fraud must be actual, and not mere fraud in law. Neal v. Clark, 95 U. S. 704; Wolf v. Stix, 99 U. S. 1, 7. The referee has reported evidence, and has not decided the general question of fraud.

Case discharged.

Stanley and Blodgett, JJ.,did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neal v. Clark
95 U.S. 704 (Supreme Court, 1878)
Wolf v. Stix
99 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 N.H. 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ely-v-curtis-nh-1881.