Elwonger v. Crowell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 15, 1996·No. 96-10095·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10095 Summary Calendar

SUZETTE ELWONGER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BRUCE CROWELL; JOSÉ GOMEZ; MIKE SCOTT; DEBRA GOMEZ,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-783-J - - - - - - - - - - August 7, 1996 Before KING, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Suzette Elwonger appeals the district court’s order granting

the motion for summary judgment in favor of defendants, Bruce

Crowell and Mike Scott. Elwonger argues that the district court

erred in holding that Crowell was entitled to qualified immunity

for his actions in obtaining and executing an arrest warrant

against her. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for essentially the reasons given by the district court.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-10095 - 2 -

Elwonger v. Crowell, No. 3:95-CV-783-J (N.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 1995).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elwonger v. Crowell, (5th Cir. 1996).

Elwonger v. Crowell (Elwonger v. Crowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.