Elwell v. Robbins

43 How. Pr. 108
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 43 How. Pr. 108 (Elwell v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elwell v. Robbins, 43 How. Pr. 108 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1872).

Opinion

Balcom, J.

—It was held in The N. Y. Life Ins. and Trust Co. agt. Vanderbilt, (12 Abb., 458), that in disposing oí surplus funds arising on foreclosure of a mortgage, the ■ court has authority to allow to the parties a suitable com[109]*109pensation for costs and disbursements, to be paid out of the funds, but nothing in addition to the taxable costs.

This is the special proceeding. It is provided by statute, that in special proceedings, costs may be allowed in the discretion of the court, and when allowéd shall be at the rate allowed lor similar services in civil actions (Laws of 1854, p. 593, § 3).

The claimants to the surplus money in this case, are entitled to the fees of the referee, $3, for one day, and fees of the clerk in the proceeding. The only costs, aside from disbursements, that can be allowed the claimants, at the rate allowed for similar services in civil actions, are such as are prescribed by the Code.

. The attorney for the claimants has made two motions in this proceeding, one for the appointment of the referee, and the other for the confirmation of his report. And by section 315 of the Code, not exceeding $10, for each motion can be allowed the claimants or their attorney, in the discretion of the court.

I will not say but that there may be cases where the proceeding before the referee should be regarded in the nature of a trial, and a trial fee allowed to the claimant of the surplus money in the discretion of the court. But I think no trial fee should be allowed to the claimants in this proceeding.

The attorney of the claimants seems to think, that $20 will cover his charges and the disbursements in this proceeding, and the costs and disbursements of the claimants therein, are fixed at $20, to be paid to them or their attorney out of the surplus money in question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Borland v. Alleond
8 Daly 126 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 How. Pr. 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elwell-v-robbins-nysupct-1872.