Elvis Cruz v. City of Miami
This text of Elvis Cruz v. City of Miami (Elvis Cruz v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 20, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-2199 Lower Tribunal No. 21-10716-CA-01 ________________
Elvis Cruz, Appellant,
vs.
City of Miami, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Migna Sanchez-Llorens, Judge.
David J. Winker, P.A., and David J. Winker, for appellant.
George K. Wysong, III, City Attorney, Eric J. Eves, Assistant City Attorney Supervisor and Marguerite C. Snyder, Assistant City Attorney, for appellee City of Miami.
Before LOGUE, MILLER and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Inspired Capital, LLC v. Howell, 387 So. 3d 348, 352
(Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (“A fact finder may award nominal damages upon a
finding of a breach.”) (emphasis added); Continuum Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v.
Continuum VI, Inc., 549 So. 2d 1125, 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (“While
nominal damages can be awarded when a legal wrong has been proven, but
the aggrieved party suffered no damages, or where, e.g., a contract has been
breached, but for one reason or another recoverable damages were not
proven, such is not the case here.”) (citations omitted).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Elvis Cruz v. City of Miami, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elvis-cruz-v-city-of-miami-fladistctapp-2026.