Elvia Solorzano-Robinson individually and on behalf of Jasmine Robinson v. PV Holding Corp.
This text of Elvia Solorzano-Robinson individually and on behalf of Jasmine Robinson v. PV Holding Corp. (Elvia Solorzano-Robinson individually and on behalf of Jasmine Robinson v. PV Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
ELVIA SOLORZANO-ROBINSON NO. 2025 CW 0344 INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF JASMINE ROBINSON
VERSUS
PV HOLDING CORP., BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC., AVIS BUDGET CAR RENTAL, LLC, ALBERT DICKEY, AND PROGRESSIVE SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
JUNE 05, 2025
In Re: Albert Dickey, PV Holding Corp., Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC, Budget Rent-A-Car System, Inc., Chubb Group of Insurance Companies and ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 721403.
BEFORE : PENZATO, WOLFE, MILLER, EDWARDS, AND FIELDS, JJ.
WRIT DENIED. The criteria set forth in Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So.2d 878 (La. 1981) (per curiam), are not met.
SMM BDE WEF
Penzato and Wolfe, JJ., dissent. When a party raises a motion that must be proven, it is that party’s burden to present evidence establishing the claims made therein. Landis Const. Co. L.L.C v. State, 2015-1167 (La. App. list Cir. 2/29/16), 199 So.3d 1, 2. Evidence not properly and officially offered and introduced cannot be considered, even if it is physically placed in the record. Documents attached to memoranda do not constitute evidence and cannot be considered. Denoux v. Vessel Mgmt. Services, Inc., 2007- 2143 (La. 5/21/08), 983 So.2d 84, 88. While documents were attached to the memoranda, the transcript from the hearing on the motions reflects that no evidence was properly and officially offered and introduced at the hearing. Therefore, we would reverse the trial court’s pre-trial rulings assigned as error in this writ as they lacked evidentiary support.
~COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Ana! Sf kL ERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Elvia Solorzano-Robinson individually and on behalf of Jasmine Robinson v. PV Holding Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elvia-solorzano-robinson-individually-and-on-behalf-of-jasmine-robinson-v-lactapp-2025.