Elvert Hubert Johnson v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 31, 2006
Docket12-06-00016-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Elvert Hubert Johnson v. State (Elvert Hubert Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elvert Hubert Johnson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

                     NO. 12-06-00016-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT


TYLER, TEXAS


ELVERT HUBERT JOHNSON,                       §     APPEAL FROM THE 145TH

APPELLANT


V.                                                                         §     JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF


THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE                                                        §     NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS






MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

            This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant was convicted of the offense of theft by a public servant, and punishment was imposed in open court on October 20, 2005. Consequently, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on November 21, 2005. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). However, Appellant filed his notice of appeal on November 22, 2005. Therefore, Appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely, which leaves us without jurisdiction over the appeal.

            On January 18, 2006, this Court notified Appellant, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.2, that the information received in this appeal does not show the jurisdiction of this Court. Appellant was further notified that the appeal would be dismissed unless the information was amended on or before January 30, 2006 to show the jurisdiction of this Court.

            Appellant has neither shown the jurisdiction of this Court or otherwise responded to the January 18 notice. This Court has no authority to allow the late filing of a notice of appeal except as provided by Rule 26.3. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (per curiam); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered January 31, 2006.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.


(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Elvert Hubert Johnson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elvert-hubert-johnson-v-state-texapp-2006.