Elul Realty Corp. v. Glabman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Elul Realty Corp. v. Glabman

8 A.D.3d 425, 778 N.Y.S.2d 692, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8413

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 14, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated June 11, 2001, which denied a motion which was, in effect, for leave to reargue a prior motion to dismiss the matter based upon its default in discovery.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly treated the motion as one for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see SantaMaria v Schwartz, 238 AD2d 569 [1997]). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated June 11, 2001, which denied a motion which was, in effect, for leave to reargue a prior motion to dismiss the matter based upon its default in discovery.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly treated the motion as one for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see SantaMaria v Schwartz, 238 AD2d 569 [1997]). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Elul Realty Corp. v. Glabman, 8 A.D.3d 425, 778 N.Y.S.2d 692, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8413 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

8 A.D.3d 425 (Elul Realty Corp. v. Glabman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related