Elton Zalos Ortiz v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-10-00411-CR
ELTON ZALOS ORTIZ APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
Appellant Elton Zalos Ortiz appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
motion for post-conviction DNA testing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art.
64.01 (West Supp. 2010). Ortiz’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a
motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel
avers that, in his professional opinion, the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief
and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable
grounds for relief. 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). This court informed
Ortiz that he may file a pro se brief, but he has not done so. The State declined
to submit a brief in response to the Anders brief.
Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on
the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this
court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See
Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State,
904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may
we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–
83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with
counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in
the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178
S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d
684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to
withdraw and affirm the trial court’s order.
BILL MEIER JUSTICE
2 PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; MEIER, J; and DIXON W. HOLMAN (Senior Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment).
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: June 2, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elton Zalos Ortiz v. State (Elton Zalos Ortiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.