Elter v. Ritvo
228 A.D.2d 410, 643 N.Y.2d 424, 643 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6233
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Material questions of fact remain as to whether the plaintiff John R. Elter suffered a "serious injury” as defined by Insuranee Law § 5102 (d) and whether the injury was proximately caused by the accident (see, Beckett v Conte, 176 AD2d 774; Petrone v Thornton, 166 AD2d 513; Gokey v Castine, 163 AD2d 709; Partlow v Meehan, 155 AD2d 647; Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on these issues. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elter v. Ritvo, 228 A.D.2d 410, 643 N.Y.2d 424, 643 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 410 (Elter v. Ritvo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Herard v. Alltex Laminating Corp.
283 A.D.2d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Dabbs v. Kelly
245 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)