Elsterman v. Kahlen

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Elsterman v. Kahlen

30 Misc. 795, 63 N.Y.S. 234

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 795 (Elsterman v. Kahlen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elsterman v. Kahlen, 30 Misc. 795, 63 N.Y.S. 234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The objection at folio 71 was not well taken. The point was not, what was the defendant’s financial condition, but what had he said his financial condition was, and this evidence did not bear upon that point. The question at folio 66, to which the defendant objected, does not seem to have been answered. Moreover, the facts sought to be shown by that question had been brought out by the defendant’s attorney at page 48, and, therefore, the defendant was not injured by the ruling of the court.

There are no other objections that are worthy of attention.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The objection at folio 71 was not well taken. The point was not, what was the defendant’s financial condition, but what had he said his financial condition was, and this evidence did not bear upon that point. The question at folio 66, to which the defendant objected, does not seem to have been answered. Moreover, the facts sought to be shown by that question had been brought out by the defendant’s attorney at page 48, and, therefore, the defendant was not injured by the ruling of the court.

There are no other objections that are worthy of attention.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Misc. 795, 63 N.Y.S. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elsterman-v-kahlen-nyappterm-1900.