Elson v. Renoclaf Realty Corp.
248 A.D. 212, 290 N.Y.S. 644, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6117
Opinion
The judgment and order should be reversed, with costs to the appellants, and the complaint dismissed, with [213]*213costs, upon the ground that the negligence of the plaintiff Salle McC. Elson contributed to the accident. The injury could not have occurred if she had exercised ordinary care in attempting to close the door.
Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Unteemyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elson v. Renoclaf Realty Corp., 248 A.D. 212, 290 N.Y.S. 644, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 212 (Elson v. Renoclaf Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.