Else v. State

386 S.W.3d 928, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1643, 2012 WL 6682199
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 2012·No. No. WD 74401·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Else appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Else contends that the motion court erred in denying his motion because his plea counsel failed to file and litigate a motion to suppress a coerced confession. Else claims that plea counsel’s failure to move to suppress his confession was unreasonable and prejudiced him by rendering his pleas involuntary. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Else v. State, 386 S.W.3d 928, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1643, 2012 WL 6682199 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

386 S.W.3d 928 (Else v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.