Elsa Slaney v. Renee M. Livesay and Keith Livesay
This text of Elsa Slaney v. Renee M. Livesay and Keith Livesay (Elsa Slaney v. Renee M. Livesay and Keith Livesay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-04-636-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
______________________________________________________ _
ELSA SLANEY, ET AL., Appellants,
v.
RENEE M. LIVESAY AND KEITH LIVESAY, Appellees.
On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2
of Hidalgo County, Texas.
_______________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellants, ELSA SLANEY, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-04-582-B. The clerk=s record was filed on December 3, 2004. The reporter=s record was filed on December 17, 2004. Appellants= brief was due on June 30, 2005. To date, no appellate brief has been received.
When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant=s failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).
On August 1, 2005, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellants were given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants= failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court=s notice, and appellants= failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this the 30th day of August, 2005
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Elsa Slaney v. Renee M. Livesay and Keith Livesay, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elsa-slaney-v-renee-m-livesay-and-keith-livesay-texapp-2005.