Elsa Prado, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rolando Prado, Jr., and as Next Friend of A.P., Minor Elizabeth Prado Rolando Prado And Maria Prado v. Lonestar Resources, Inc., Ezra Alderman Ranches, Inc. and Union Pacific Railroad Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 28, 2021
Docket04-19-00543-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Elsa Prado, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rolando Prado, Jr., and as Next Friend of A.P., Minor Elizabeth Prado Rolando Prado And Maria Prado v. Lonestar Resources, Inc., Ezra Alderman Ranches, Inc. and Union Pacific Railroad Company (Elsa Prado, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rolando Prado, Jr., and as Next Friend of A.P., Minor Elizabeth Prado Rolando Prado And Maria Prado v. Lonestar Resources, Inc., Ezra Alderman Ranches, Inc. and Union Pacific Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elsa Prado, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rolando Prado, Jr., and as Next Friend of A.P., Minor Elizabeth Prado Rolando Prado And Maria Prado v. Lonestar Resources, Inc., Ezra Alderman Ranches, Inc. and Union Pacific Railroad Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT No. 04-19-00543-CV

Elsa PRADO, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rolando Prado, Jr., Deceased, and as Next Friend of A.P., Minor; Elizabeth Prado; Rolando Prado; and Maria Prado; Appellants

v.

LONESTAR RESOURCES, INC., Ezra Alderman Ranches, Inc., and Union Pacific Railroad Company, Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas Trial Court No. 16-07-00095-CVL Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding 1

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED IN PART. Specifically, we AFFIRM the trial court’s summary judgment as to appellants’ “failure to issue a slow order” claim against appellee Union Pacific Railroad Company and their failure-to-warn claim against appellee Lonestar Resources, Inc. The remainder of the trial court’s judgment is REVERSED. We REMAND the Prados’ failure-to-warn claim against Union Pacific Railroad Company and Ezra Alderman Ranches, Inc. to the trial court for further proceedings.

We further ORDER that the parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal.

SIGNED July 28, 2021.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

1 Sitting by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Elsa Prado, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rolando Prado, Jr., and as Next Friend of A.P., Minor Elizabeth Prado Rolando Prado And Maria Prado v. Lonestar Resources, Inc., Ezra Alderman Ranches, Inc. and Union Pacific Railroad Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elsa-prado-individually-and-as-representative-of-the-estate-of-rolando-texapp-2021.