Els v. North Carolina
This text of 588 F. App'x 250 (Els v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Anthony Leon Hoover appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge [251]*251and dismissing his complaint without prejudice for inter alia failure to file the complaint on the required forms and failure to include all necessary information. Because Hoover may refile his suit by filing his complaint in accordance with the district court’s directions, the dismissal order is interlocutory and not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
588 F. App'x 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/els-v-north-carolina-ca4-2014.