Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Elrod v. Sutton

Elrod v. Sutton

164 S.E. 682, 174 Ga. 900, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 167
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 16, 1932
DocketNo. 8786
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 164 S.E. 682 (Elrod v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elrod v. Sutton, 164 S.E. 682, 174 Ga. 900, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 167 (Ga. 1932).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

The motion for a new trial in this ease contains only the usual general grounds; and there being sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict, the court below did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, G. J., and Atkinson, Hill and Gilbert, JJ., concur. B. F. Whelchel, W. P. Whelchel, and B. P. Gaillard Jr., for plaintiff in error. Hammond Johnson, B. W. Smith Jr., and Alex. M. Hitz, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boles v. Eddleman
6 S.E.2d 589 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 S.E. 682, 174 Ga. 900, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elrod-v-sutton-ga-1932.