Elrod v. State

142 S.E. 312, 37 Ga. App. 822, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 642
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1928
Docket18644
StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.E. 312 (Elrod v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elrod v. State, 142 S.E. 312, 37 Ga. App. 822, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the motion for a new trial show cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 S.E. 312, 37 Ga. App. 822, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elrod-v-state-gactapp-1928.