Elrod v. Continental Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Elrod v. Continental Casualty Co.

147 S.E. 591, 39 Ga. App. 475, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 367

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 6, 1929

Docket19381

StatusPublished

This text of 147 S.E. 591 (Elrod v. Continental Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elrod v. Continental Casualty Co., 147 S.E. 591, 39 Ga. App. 475, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 367 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The assignment of error in the bill of exceptions upon the ruling out of certain testimony can not be considered by this court, since the testimony excluded is set out so vaguely and obscurely as not to be thoroughly understandable. In the state of the record no question is raised by this assignment of error.

2. Under the evidence adduced by the plaintiff a nonsuit was properly awarded. Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The assignment of error in the bill of exceptions upon the ruling out of certain testimony can not be considered by this court, since the testimony excluded is set out so vaguely and obscurely as not to be thoroughly understandable. In the state of the record no question is raised by this assignment of error.

2. Under the evidence adduced by the plaintiff a nonsuit was properly awarded. Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 S.E. 591, 39 Ga. App. 475, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elrod-v-continental-casualty-co-gactapp-1929.