Elrod v. Adams Exp. Co.
82 F. 1000
This text of 82 F. 1000 (Elrod v. Adams Exp. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Elrod v. Adams Exp. Co., 82 F. 1000 (6th Cir. 1897).
Opinion
In Error from the United States Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky. O’Neal & Pryor and George Weissinger Smith, for plaintiff in error. Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., and Stone & Sudduth, for defendant in error. Dismissed, on motion of defendant in error, pursuant to the twenty-third rule, for failure to print the record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
82 F. 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elrod-v-adams-exp-co-ca6-1897.