Elps v. State
551 So. 2d 1256, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2599, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6307, 1989 WL 135516
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to amend his earlier filed petition for writ of habeas corpus, but do so without prejudice to the appellant raising the application of the supreme court’s decision in Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989) in a motion to correct sentence, pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800(a). See Gibbons v. State, 543 So.2d 860 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Wahl v. State, 543 So.2d 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elps v. State, 551 So. 2d 1256, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2599, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6307, 1989 WL 135516 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
551 So. 2d 1256 (Elps v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
537 So. 2d 982 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Wahl v. State
543 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Gibbons v. State
543 So. 2d 860 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)