Elps v. State
This text of 551 So. 2d 1256 (Elps v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to amend his earlier filed petition for writ of habeas corpus, but do so without prejudice to the appellant raising the application of the supreme court’s decision in Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989) in a motion to correct sentence, pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800(a). See Gibbons v. State, 543 So.2d 860 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Wahl v. State, 543 So.2d 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 So. 2d 1256, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2599, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6307, 1989 WL 135516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elps-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.