Eloy Soto Cavazos v. Antonia Aracenia Cavazos Gonzalez
This text of Eloy Soto Cavazos v. Antonia Aracenia Cavazos Gonzalez (Eloy Soto Cavazos v. Antonia Aracenia Cavazos Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00825-CV
Eloy Soto CAVAZOS, Appellant
v.
Antonia Aracenia CAVAZOS GONZALEZ, et al., Appellees
From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 10538 Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 5, 2025
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Prospective appellant Eloy Soto Cavazos attempts to appeal a trial court’s April 2, 1935
order. Because appellant filed his notice of appeal on December 3, 2024, nearly ninety years late,
we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
by January 30, 2025. See id. Appellant responded to our order attaching emails to his response,
which appear to provide his ancestor was divested “of any mineral or surface” interest in certain
real property in the 1935 case. He explains that his notice of appeal was late because another
individual won a case in 2017 “under the name of Andres Cavazos and his heirs” and, while he 04-24-00825-CV
“trusted [the individual] and gave full permission to collect any money from banks for minerals,”
he has not heard from those heirs even though they are apparently “already receiving money from
minerals.” He states he has sought help from five different lawyers to no avail.
While Appellant sets forth his dispute, he has not shown why this court has jurisdiction to
address it. “[O]nce the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has
passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” See Verburgt v. Dorner,
959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing predecessor to Rule 26).
Accordingly, we dismiss this untimely appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eloy Soto Cavazos v. Antonia Aracenia Cavazos Gonzalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eloy-soto-cavazos-v-antonia-aracenia-cavazos-gonzalez-texapp-2025.