Eloy Heraclio Alcala v. the State of Texas
This text of Eloy Heraclio Alcala v. the State of Texas (Eloy Heraclio Alcala v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00614-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
ELOY HERACLIO ALCALA, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva Order Per Curiam
This cause is currently before the Court on appellant’s motion for rehearing of order
denying appellant’s opposed emergency motion for leave to file his second amended brief
that exceeds word limit, to raise additional issues, and to extend submission time for
appellee’s responsive brief. The second amended brief was filed after the Court’s
submission of the case on September 29, 2021. Appellant’s motion urges reconsideration of our previous denial for additional
briefing on the basis of judicial economy, further asserting the case will likely be reviewed
for ineffective assistance. We note that the second amended brief was filed on October
18, 2021, over eighteen months after appellant’s first amended brief was filed on April 9,
2020.
The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's motion for rehearing,
is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant’s motion for rehearing should be
granted. Appellant’s motion for rehearing of order denying appellant’s opposed
emergency motion for leave to file his second amended brief that exceeds word limit, to
raise additional issues, and to extend submission time for appellee’s responsive brief is
hereby granted. The Court also withdraws its submission.
Under these circumstances and in order to effectuate the proper and complete
presentation of this appeal to the Court, we abate this appeal and remove it from the
Court’s active docket. The appeal shall be reinstated after the State’s response brief has
been properly and duly filed. The State’s response is hereby ordered due thirty days from
the date of this order.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 29th day of October, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eloy Heraclio Alcala v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eloy-heraclio-alcala-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.