Eloy Heraclio Alcala v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 29, 2021
Docket13-18-00614-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Eloy Heraclio Alcala v. the State of Texas (Eloy Heraclio Alcala v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eloy Heraclio Alcala v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00614-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

ELOY HERACLIO ALCALA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva Order Per Curiam

This cause is currently before the Court on appellant’s motion for rehearing of order

denying appellant’s opposed emergency motion for leave to file his second amended brief

that exceeds word limit, to raise additional issues, and to extend submission time for

appellee’s responsive brief. The second amended brief was filed after the Court’s

submission of the case on September 29, 2021. Appellant’s motion urges reconsideration of our previous denial for additional

briefing on the basis of judicial economy, further asserting the case will likely be reviewed

for ineffective assistance. We note that the second amended brief was filed on October

18, 2021, over eighteen months after appellant’s first amended brief was filed on April 9,

2020.

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's motion for rehearing,

is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant’s motion for rehearing should be

granted. Appellant’s motion for rehearing of order denying appellant’s opposed

emergency motion for leave to file his second amended brief that exceeds word limit, to

raise additional issues, and to extend submission time for appellee’s responsive brief is

hereby granted. The Court also withdraws its submission.

Under these circumstances and in order to effectuate the proper and complete

presentation of this appeal to the Court, we abate this appeal and remove it from the

Court’s active docket. The appeal shall be reinstated after the State’s response brief has

been properly and duly filed. The State’s response is hereby ordered due thirty days from

the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 29th day of October, 2021.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Eloy Heraclio Alcala v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eloy-heraclio-alcala-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.