Elonka v. Elonka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Elonka v. Elonka

1 A.D.2d 693, 148 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3644

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 693 (Elonka v. Elonka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elonka v. Elonka, 1 A.D.2d 693, 148 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to compel support, the appeals are from (1) an order of the Children’s Court, Nassau County, continuing a previous order directing (a) that appellant pay $40 a week for food and $5 a week for drugs and medicine; (b) that respondent collect the rent from the cottage on the premises owned jointly by the parties; (e) that temporary custody of the two minor children be given to respondent, with rights of visitation to appellant, and that he remove from his home by March 7, 1955; and (2) from an order of the Supreme Court affirming the order of the Children’s Court as to the support provision, and dismissing the appeal from the other provisions of the order. Orders unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present—Nolan, P. J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to compel support, the appeals are from (1) an order of the Children’s Court, Nassau County, continuing a previous order directing (a) that appellant pay $40 a week for food and $5 a week for drugs and medicine; (b) that respondent collect the rent from the cottage on the premises owned jointly by the parties; (e) that temporary custody of the two minor children be given to respondent, with rights of visitation to appellant, and that he remove from his home by March 7, 1955; and (2) from an order of the Supreme Court affirming the order of the Children’s Court as to the support provision, and dismissing the appeal from the other provisions of the order. Orders unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present—Nolan, P. J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 693, 148 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elonka-v-elonka-nyappdiv-1955.