Elofir v. Hamane

125 So. 3d 329, 2013 WL 5762087, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17049
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 22, 2013
DocketNo. 5D13-1686
StatusPublished

This text of 125 So. 3d 329 (Elofir v. Hamane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elofir v. Hamane, 125 So. 3d 329, 2013 WL 5762087, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17049 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.315(a); Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

PALMER, ORFINGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 So. 3d 329, 2013 WL 5762087, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elofir-v-hamane-fladistctapp-2013.