Elof Malm v. United States Lines Company

Second Circuit

Elof Malm v. United States Lines Company

378 F.2d 941, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6114

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 5, 1967

Docket31199

StatusPublished

This text of 378 F.2d 941 (Elof Malm v. United States Lines Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elof Malm v. United States Lines Company, 378 F.2d 941, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6114 (2d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

378 F.2d 941

Elof MALM, Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, Appellant.

No. 489, Docket 31199.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 31, 1967.
Decided June 5, 1967.

Daniel J. Dougherty, New York City (Charles N. Fiddler, Kirlin Campbell & Keating, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas E. P. McElligott, Fields, Rosen, McElligott & Auslander, New York City, for appellee.

Before WATERMAN, SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on the basis of Judge Weinfeld's opinion in the District Court, reported at 269 F.Supp. 731 (S.D.N.Y. 1967).1

1

Since neither party on appeal raised the issue of maintenance and cure, we have not considered that portion of Judge Weinfeld's opinion

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI