Elof Malm v. United States Lines Company

378 F.2d 941, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6114
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 5, 1967·No. 31199·Published

Opinion

378 F.2d 941

Elof MALM, Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, Appellant.

No. 489, Docket 31199.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 31, 1967.
Decided June 5, 1967.

Daniel J. Dougherty, New York City (Charles N. Fiddler, Kirlin Campbell & Keating, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas E. P. McElligott, Fields, Rosen, McElligott & Auslander, New York City, for appellee.

Before WATERMAN, SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on the basis of Judge Weinfeld's opinion in the District Court, reported at 269 F.Supp. 731 (S.D.N.Y. 1967).1

1

Since neither party on appeal raised the issue of maintenance and cure, we have not considered that portion of Judge Weinfeld's opinion

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elof Malm v. United States Lines Company, 378 F.2d 941, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6114 (2d Cir. 1967).

378 F.2d 941 (Elof Malm v. United States Lines Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malm v. United States Lines Company
269 F. Supp. 731 (S.D. New York, 1967)
Malm v. United States Lines Co.
378 F.2d 941 (Second Circuit, 1967)