Elmsmere Associates v. Gladstone
153 A.D.2d 821, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12182
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, and insofar as it seeks reargument or clarification granted only to the extent of amending the memorandum decision of this court filed herein by deleting the period at the end of the majority’s memorandum decision [153 AD2d 501] and adding "as well as minus the closing costs incurred by defendants in connection with the sale to the CBS-Hines joint venture”. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elmsmere Associates v. Gladstone, 153 A.D.2d 821, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
153 A.D.2d 821 (Elmsmere Associates v. Gladstone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wong v. New York Times Co.
297 A.D.2d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)