Elms v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Elms v. State

1912 OK CR 58, 119 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 716, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 274

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 16, 1912·No. No. A-1170.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Caddo county at the January, 1911, term, on a charge of having the possession of intoxicating liquor with the unlawful intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of two hundred fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of ninety days. Following the rule laid down in the Stumpf case, the Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is well taken and is sustained. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Caddo county at the January, 1911, term, on a charge of having the possession of intoxicating liquor with the unlawful intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of two hundred fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of ninety days. Following the rule laid down in the Stumpf case, the Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is well taken and is sustained. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Elms v. State, 1912 OK CR 58, 119 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 716, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 274 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 58 (Elms v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.