Elms (Lorna) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
LORNA LOUISE ELMS, No. 81407 Petitioner,
vs.
THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED HUIVIBOLDT; AND THE HONORABLE JUL 3 0 2020
MICHAEL MONTERO, DISTRICT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
JUDGE, CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Respondents, BY DEPU'r%t_Ettl.211/41#
and
THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION
Petitioner and respondent Michael Montero have filed a stipulation to dismiss this matter.1 The stipulation is treated and granted as a joint motion to dismiss. This matter is dismissed.
It is so ORDERED.
Ale.111G4.-0 LI—Zekte , J.
Stiglich Silver
1 The stipulation is also signed by attorney Kevin Pasquale, purportedly on behalf of real party in interest. However, Mr. Pasquale is not counsel of record for real party in interest.
aló -027774-
cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge Humboldt County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Humboldt County District Attorney Humboldt County Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF NEVADA
(0) I 947A .ege;ED 2 • -•
f•i:, • r-4::‘'.11 '
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elms (Lorna) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Elms (Lorna) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.