Elmrharri v. Marriott International, Inc.

S.D. New York

Elmrharri v. Marriott International, Inc.

DecidedJuly 24, 2020

Docket1:20-cv-00325

StatusUnknown

This text of Elmrharri v. Marriott International, Inc. (Elmrharri v. Marriott International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elmrharri v. Marriott International, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: ccna a a naan IK DATE FILED:_7/24/2020 EVELYN ELMRHARRI, as mother and natural guardian : of A.E., : Plaintiff, : 20-cv-0325 (LJL) -v- : ORDER MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., : Defendant. :

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: On July 8, 2020, the parties submitted a proposed infant compromise order. Dkt. No. 16. The proposed order references a medical report but fails to attach the “medical or hospital report” required by N.Y. C.P.L.R. 1208(c). In addition, the affidavit submitted by Plaintiffs counsel fails to include the hours expended on this matter or information that would permit this Court to determine the amount of suitable compensation and the value of the attorney services. See ILM. by Hartmann v. DiConstanzo, 2020 WL 1330241, at *5-7 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2020) (“[I]n approving an infant settlement, the Court must not simply accept the contingency fee agreement between the parties.”). Plaintiffs counsel is directed to submit the requested information within fourteen (14) days of this Order.

SO ORDERED. eo mF Dated: July 24, 2020 wel MC sw New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: ccna a a naan IK DATE FILED:_7/24/2020 EVELYN ELMRHARRI, as mother and natural guardian : of A.E., : Plaintiff, : 20-cv-0325 (LJL) -v- : ORDER MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., : Defendant. :

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: On July 8, 2020, the parties submitted a proposed infant compromise order. Dkt. No. 16. The proposed order references a medical report but fails to attach the “medical or hospital report” required by N.Y. C.P.L.R. 1208(c). In addition, the affidavit submitted by Plaintiffs counsel fails to include the hours expended on this matter or information that would permit this Court to determine the amount of suitable compensation and the value of the attorney services. See ILM. by Hartmann v. DiConstanzo, 2020 WL 1330241, at *5-7 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2020) (“[I]n approving an infant settlement, the Court must not simply accept the contingency fee agreement between the parties.”). Plaintiffs counsel is directed to submit the requested information within fourteen (14) days of this Order.

SO ORDERED. eo mF Dated: July 24, 2020 wel MC sw New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Elmrharri v. Marriott International, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elmrharri-v-marriott-international-inc-nysd-2020.