Elmore v. Hammond

642 So. 2d 128, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8831, 1994 WL 497313
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 14, 1994·No. No. 94-499·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.-

We reverse the denial to appellant of unemployment compensation benefits for the period after she quit her part-time job. An employee who quits a part-time job does not forfeit prior unemployment benefits. Stewart v. Dollar Tree, 635 So.2d 73 (Fla. 1st [129]*129DCA 1994); Wright v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 512 So.2d 333 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Neese v. Sizzler Family Steak House, 404 So.2d 371 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Appellant was receiving benefits based on her employment with River Region Human Services when she accepted part-time employment from Lizena’s Cleaning Service. She later had to give up the job with Lizena’s because she had no reliable transportation. The Division of Unemployment Compensation thereafter erroneously ceased appellant’s unemployment benefits which had arisen out of her full-time employment with River Region. These benefits must be reinstated retroactive to the date they were terminated.

REVERSED, with instructions.

ALLEN, KAHN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elmore v. Hammond, 642 So. 2d 128, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8831, 1994 WL 497313 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

642 So. 2d 128 (Elmore v. Hammond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. FLA. UNEMP. APPEALS COM'N
512 So. 2d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Stewart v. Dollar Tree
635 So. 2d 73 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Neese v. Sizzler Family Steak House
404 So. 2d 371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)