Elmore v. Dudley Shoals Cotton Mills Co.

153 S.E. 629, 199 N.C. 803, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 261
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 2, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 153 S.E. 629 (Elmore v. Dudley Shoals Cotton Mills Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elmore v. Dudley Shoals Cotton Mills Co., 153 S.E. 629, 199 N.C. 803, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 261 (N.C. 1930).

Opinion

Bek CueiaM.

On controverted issues of fact, the jury has found in favor of the plaintiff. The case was tried in substantial conformity to the principles of law applicable and the authoritative decisions on the *804 subject. We have found no ruling or action on the part of the learned trial judge which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

The motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence is without controlling merit, and must be overruled as not meeting the requirements laid down for such motions in Johnson v. R. R., 163 N. C., 431, 79 S. E., 690.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. . R. R.
79 S.E. 690 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 S.E. 629, 199 N.C. 803, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elmore-v-dudley-shoals-cotton-mills-co-nc-1930.