Elmore v. Commonwealth
This text of 257 S.W. 32 (Elmore v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion op the Court by
Affirming.
This is an appeal from a judgment convicting appellant of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor.
The ground on which a reversal is asked is that all the evidence tending to show appellant’s guilt was obtained by an illegal search of his person. We have carefully examined the record and find that appellant did not object to the evidence complained of or move to exclude it. All that he did was to ask for a peremptory instruction. It is well settled that a request for a peremptory which challenges merely'the sufficiency of the evidence will not raise the question of admissibility, and that, in the absence of objection and exception, or motion to exclude; error in the admission of evidence is not available on appeal. Sorrels v. Commonwealth, 197 Ky. 761, 248 S. W. 205.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 S.W. 32, 201 Ky. 427, 1923 Ky. LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elmore-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1923.