Elmo Williams v. Fred Dickson, Warden, Etc.

394 F.2d 627, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7019
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 9, 1968·No. 21800_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court dismissing the action before process was issued and served, without notice to the appellant of any motion to dismiss, and without any finding of frivolity or malice (28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)), is reversed and remanded. Harmon v. Superior Court, 307 F.2d 796 (9th Cir.); Armstrong v. Rushing, 352 F.2d 836, 837 (9th Cir.). We do not pass on the merits of the action, if any.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elmo Williams v. Fred Dickson, Warden, Etc., 394 F.2d 627, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7019 (9th Cir. 1968).

394 F.2d 627 (Elmo Williams v. Fred Dickson, Warden, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jerry S. Diamond v. Peter J. Pitchess, Sheriff
411 F.2d 565 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)