Elmira Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Spring

261 A.D. 1034, 26 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8611
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 19, 1941·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Action to foreclose a real estate mortgage. The answer sets up a counterclaim which if established would nearly equal the mortgage debt. Upon the opening of the trial defendant’s attorney stated as followsIf your honor please I want to call for a jury here in this case. A question of fact.” This action is not one specified in section 425 of the Civil Practice Act. No motion was made to frame issues under sections 429, 430 et seq. of the Civil Practice Act. Judgment unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Sehenck and Poster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elmira Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Spring, 261 A.D. 1034, 26 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

261 A.D. 1034 (Elmira Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Spring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Furber v. Sidell
6 Misc. 2d 554 (New York County Courts, 1957)
Security Discount Associates, Inc. v. Weissbaum
283 A.D. 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Feldman v. Sturm
278 A.D. 21 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)