Elmira Advertiser Ass'n v. Hugo
174 A.D. 899, 159 N.Y.S. 1111
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 174 A.D. 899 (Elmira Advertiser Ass'n v. Hugo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Elmira Advertiser Ass'n v. Hugo, 174 A.D. 899, 159 N.Y.S. 1111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
Motion todismiss appeal denied. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. This court finds that the Republican supervisors were justified by the facts in determining that the Elmira Advertiser did not, at the time of the designation, fairly represent the Republican party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
174 A.D. 899, 159 N.Y.S. 1111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elmira-advertiser-assn-v-hugo-nyappdiv-1916.