Elmes's v. Esteva's Syndics

2 Mart. 264

Opinion

Some property of the defendants had been sold at the instance of the plaintiffs, and the money ordered to be at the order of the court; it was now ordered to be paid over, and the syndics claimed to retain part of it, for expences in law proceedings; and the court, referring to their decision in Ellery vs. Amelung's syntics, ante 244, said a priviledge cuuid be allowed on taxed costs only.