Elmer v. Hourihan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Elmer v. Hourihan

21 A.D.2d 739, 251 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3825

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 739 (Elmer v. Hourihan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elmer v. Hourihan, 21 A.D.2d 739, 251 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3825 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Bastow, J. P., and Del Vecchio, J., who dissent and vote to reverse and reinstate the verdict. (Appeal from order of Monroe Trial Term granting defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict in favor of plaintiff in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Bastow, J. P., and Del Vecchio, J., who dissent and vote to reverse and reinstate the verdict. (Appeal from order of Monroe Trial Term granting defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict in favor of plaintiff in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 739, 251 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elmer-v-hourihan-nyappdiv-1964.