Elmer v. Hinkley

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 21, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-00871·Unknown

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JOHN ELMER, Case No. 1:24-cv-00871-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY 13 v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT 14 HINKLEY, et al., ORDER AND WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 6) 16 NOVEMBER 27, 2024 DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff commenced this action on July 30, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) A scheduling 19 conference is currently set for December 5, 2024. (ECF No. 5.) Because Plaintiff had not 20 returned service documents and Defendants have not filed a responsive pleading, the Court 21 ordered Plaintiff to file a notice regarding the status of service on Defendants no later than 22 November 20, 2024. (ECF No. 6.) The Court advised Plaintiff that failure to comply with the 23 November 13, 2024 order may result in the issuance of sanctions, up to and including dismissal 24 of this action. Plaintiff failed to file a notice of status of service by November 20, 2024 as 25 required by the Court’s November 13, 2024 order. 26 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these 27 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions … within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 1 | control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, 2 | including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 3 | 2000). 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause in writing no 5 | later than November 27, 2024 why this matter should not be dismissed failure to prosecute and 6 | why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to respond to the Court’s November 13, 2024 7 Plaintiff is forewarned that the failure to show cause in writing may result in the 8 | imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of this action. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 11 | Dated: _ November 21, 2024 STANLEY A. BOONE 12 United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elmer v. Hinkley, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Elmer v. Hinkley (Elmer v. Hinkley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.